Source: The Economic Times
Lack of opportunity in traditional debt funds that play on interest rate movements does not warrant
a complete switch
to the credit funds. If you wish to play the credit risk, avoid going for the overly aggressive funds that chase higher yields
with concentrated exposure
in very low rated instruments. “If already invested
in credit funds, rebalance in favour of cleaner credit at this juncture,” says Prabhu.
![]() |
Several funds in the category have clocked more than 10% return over the past one year. |
With the central
bank signaling a neutral interest
rate stance in its latest monetary policy review, the rally in gilt funds has petered out. They have been knocked
off their perch by credit opportunities funds, which have emerged the top performers in the debt funds space
over the past one year. The category generated
an average return
of 9.6%.
Gilt funds and credit opportunities funds play on different
aspects of the bond market.
The former invest in longer
maturity government securities that witness high capital appreciation in a softening
interest rate environment. The latter focus on interest
accrual— the income from coupon payments on underlying bonds—and typically invest in corporate bonds with a higher yield but lower rating (AA or below).
Credit funds can also make some returns
from capital gains, by looking
for mismatches in the current
rating of a bond vis-a-vis
its fundamentals. If the credit rating of the underlying
bond gets upgraded,
due to the improving fundamentals of the underlying company, it results in appreciation in the bond’s market
price, boosting the fund’s return. However, this tends to account for a smaller portion of the total return from these funds.
The cost of higher returns
With the interest
rate easing all but over, the performance driver for debt funds has shifted from bond price appreciation to income accrual.
Besides, what has worked in favour of credit funds is the lower volatility
in returns, compared
to gilt funds.
Several funds in the category
have clocked more than 10% return over the past one year. However, they have taken greater risk to generate
these returns, as is indicated
by their exposure
to lower-rated instruments (see table). BOI AXA Corporate
Credit Spectrum and Franklin India Dynamic Accrual
have invested 45% and 51% of their portfolio, respectively, in bonds rated ‘A and below’.
HIGHER RETURN,
MUCH HIGHER RISK
In a bid to generate higher
returns, several credit funds have increased exposure
to lower rated bonds.
![]() |
Source: Value Research. Data as on 4 Sep 2017 |
The category’s average
exposure to this segment is around 31%. But while BOI AXA has also taken a healthy exposure
of 22% in high safety
AAA-rated bonds, Franklin
India Dynamic has negligible investment in this segment.
AAA rating indicates
highest level of safety (little risk of default),
while A and lower rating signifies a much higher
default risk.
Baroda Pioneer Credit
Opportunities has loaded up on relatively safer AA
rated instruments, comprising 56% of its portfolio, compared
to the category average of 50%. Meanwhile, Aditya Birla Sun Life Corporate
Bond holds around 40% of its portfolio
in AAA-rated instruments—peers’ holdings in the segment
is just about 20%.
Why credit quality
is a concern
The composition of the underlying portfolio of credit funds assumes
great significance in the light of numerous
instances of corporate
loan defaults and credit rating downgrades. When underlying bonds
witness rating downgrade, their price falls sharply, eroding the
overall return from the debt fund. Companies may face ratings
downgrade owing to deteriorating fundamentals—usually
high debt levels and limited
traction in cash flows.
Recently, companies
such as IDBI Bank and Reliance Communications have seen ratings downgrades. With the credit profile of debt- riddled firms remaining weak, credit funds, in their bid to deliver high returns, are playing a high-risk game.
“Many credit funds are now carrying higher
credit risk than they started
with or intended to carry a few years ago,” says Roopali
Prabhu, Head, Investment Products, Sanctum Wealth.
The corporate credit
upgrade downgrade ratio remains unfavourable. The terms and conditions governing these bonds have become more
complex. And the liquidity position
in these funds remains untested
in the event of redemption
pressure, Prabhu adds. Although credit opportunities funds are mostly immune to unfavourable yield movement, the risk of default in underlying companies continues to be high.
“Unlike in other categories, like dynamic bond funds, the risk is far less visible in credit opportunities funds. In the event of a default,
the hit may be significant,” cautions Vidya Bala, Head, Mutual Fund Research, FundsIndia. Investors should not get swayed
by the higher returns being offered
by this segment.
Post a Comment